look at the notes! we are moving forward, but it is cross-cutting into other class related proposals like public/private fields. we are being more cautious IMO.
/caridy > On Sep 6, 2017, at 11:01 PM, Logan Smyth <[email protected]> wrote: > > Keep in that the available implementations don't necessarily reflect the > state of the spec, and that they are maintained two independent groups. > > None of the current implementations reflect the current state of the spec, > which has changed a lot over the last years. Babel for instance is also a > project maintained entirely by volunteers, and it's only in the last couple > months that someone has come forward with the time and energy available to > make progress on implementing the new version of the spec. Incidentally this > will also probably break all your existing code until new versions of the > decorators you use are written to support the new spec, so remember that > you're very much relying on an experimental feature. > > As for supporting it in more places in the syntax, the more more places it > has to support, the more work that will have to be done. Keeping function and > such as things to be approached later means the current spec can iterate more > quickly. It's hard to both iterate quickly and also support a broad feature > set. > >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Matthew Robb <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello all! >> >> Today it struck me that the usefulness and prevalence of Decorators in my >> React applications has been actively climbing and this feels to be at odds >> with the rate of progression within the committee. To me it is quickly >> rising as the most influential feature to the way I write code. At the end >> of the day my code is considerably cleaner, more declarative, and more >> composable. >> >> I am curious as to why this feature is not one of the top discussed or >> actively developed proposals in the pipeline? In the current form it's >> already proving to be so useful and would be more so if it were supported in >> more places (e.g. on functions or plain object properties). >> >> Any insight into this would be great, thank you! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
