It can be confusing because it is too similar to non-arrow functions. The arrow syntax is clear in meaning.
*/#!/*JoePea On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Brian Blakely <[email protected]> wrote: > This syntax is shorter, easier to write, and arguably easier to read. > What else does it need to offer? > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:48 PM, kai zhu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -1 >> this fails styleguide sanity-check. >> >> we currently have 3 common styles of declaring functions: >> 1. foo = function () {...} >> 2. function foo () {...} >> 3. foo = () => {...} >> >> does this extra 4th style offer anything new to justify making the >> javascript language even less consistent than it already is? i say >> no. >> >> >> On 10/25/17, Brian Blakely <[email protected]> wrote: >> > A prevalent pattern has emerged: >> > >> > `export const foo = ()=> { };` >> > >> > Taking a cue from short method syntax, this comes to mind as a possible >> > improvement: >> > >> > `export const foo() { };` >> > >> > Even better if we assume const: >> > >> > `export foo() { };` >> > >> > That is delicious. Thoughts? >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
