Is it only valid with a semicolon after `foo()`, though? Pragma without semicolon throws in three engines.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:41 PM, James Kyle <[email protected]> wrote: > To parse it that way would be changing behavior. > > obj.foo() {} > this.bar() {} > > Are both call expressions followed by a block. They are valid syntaxes > today. > > Think: > > obj.foo(); > { > let a = 1; > } > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 at 4:29 am, Brian Blakely <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Extend the method shorthand syntax beyond initial object declaration. >> >> ```js >> const obj = {}; >> >> obj.foo() {...} >> ``` >> >> Equivalent 2015 syntax: >> >> ```js >> const obj = { >> foo() {...} >> }; >> ``` >> >> This is nice for assignment to context: >> >> ```js >> function Foo() { >> this.bar() {...} >> this.baz() {...} >> } >> >> const foo = new Foo(); >> foo.bar(); >> foo.baz(); >> ``` >> >> Equivalent 2015 syntax: >> >> ```js >> function Foo() { >> this.bar = function() {...}; >> this.baz = function() {...}; >> } >> ``` >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
