There is Sweet.js, which addresses this issue somewhat. ;-) On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, 10:34 Jonathan Barronville <[email protected]> wrote:
> From the example provided, as someone who uses promises a lot, I’m not > sure I’m sold on the need for this either. Maybe you could provide some > more concrete examples, Jorge? > > > P.S. Proposals like this are why JavaScript should’ve been a LISP ;p … > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm not convinced of the need. Promises are already sufficient, and in >> general use, I rarely use the constructor outside of adapting >> callback-related code or other lower-level cases. >> >> Also, keep in mind, most such promise-returning functions do have >> arguments, which this proposal seems to miss. >> >> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, 10:23 Jorge Téllez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I would like to propose a new syntax for promises for the next >>> ECMAScript. >>> >>> It is common to define promises in the following way: >>> >>> function promiseFunction() { >>> return new Promise(resolve, reject) { >>> resolve(someValue); >>> }; >>> } >>> >>> In the previous example, I am declaring a function so that I can access >>> the promise throughout. >>> >>> I would like propose a simpler syntax to remove this redundancy: >>> >>> promise promiseFunction(resolve, reject) { >>> resolve(someValue); >>> } >>> >>> This will make the promise declaration easier to read in a similar >>> fashion as the new class syntax made it easier to declare prototypes. >>> >>> __ >>> Jorge Téllez >>> +52 1 81 2567 8257 <+52%201%2081%202567%208257> >>> @novohispano <http://twitter.com/novohispano> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > > > -- > - Jonathan > > — > > Life is a game and we’re all just high density pixels. > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
