On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Re "..in subscope" and "..relevant"; As repl's can be fixed by > that---all snippets treated as curlybraced. > Hi everyone. For those of you who weren't on this list three years ago, here's the rest of the thread: https://esdiscuss.org/topic/toplevel-let-binding-can-be-left-permanently- uninitialized-after-an-error Ever-deeper-nested-blocks is one possible behavior for a repl, and it does solve this problem by allowing you to shadow your broken `let x` with a fresh one, after a typo. It has some other drawbacks, though; see Dave Herman's post here: https://esdiscuss.org/topic/toplevel-let-binding-can-be-left-permanently- uninitialized-after-an-error#content-12 -j
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
