const ɁɁɁ = () => { throw new Error('Method not defined'); };
Thomas Grainger
On 26 March 2018 at 06:26, Isiah Meadows <isiahmead...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even in TypeScript, `never` (the type of functions that never return -
> throwing ≠ returning) is the subtype of *all* types, even primitives.
> -----
>
> Isiah Meadows
> m...@isiahmeadows.com
>
> Looking for web consulting? Or a new website?
> Send me an email and we can get started.
> www.isiahmeadows.com
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, dante federici
> <c.dante.feder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Not a bad idea -- I agree that it really belongs here, but its value is
> much
> > higher in something like TypeScript, where you can keep the typing
> signature
> > but have a missing implementation.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 3:32 AM Isiah Meadows <isiahmead...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I would suggest, if you have support in your editor, just making a
> >> `???` snippet expand to `throw new Error("unimplemented")`. I've been
> >> doing similar (mod the snippet) for a while, and it's worked pretty
> >> well.
> >> -----
> >>
> >> Isiah Meadows
> >> m...@isiahmeadows.com
> >>
> >> Looking for web consulting? Or a new website?
> >> Send me an email and we can get started.
> >> www.isiahmeadows.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:16 AM, dante federici
> >> <c.dante.feder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Simple example (ts):
> >> > ```typescript
> >> > interface SearchFunc {
> >> > (source: string, subString: string): boolean;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > // Later
> >> > let mySearch: SearchFunc;
> >> > mySearch = function(source: string, subString: string) { ??? }
> >> > ```
> >> >
> >> > Simple example (js):
> >> > ```js
> >> > class MyClass = {
> >> > foo() { return "foo"; }
> >> > bar() { return "bar"; }
> >> > }
> >> > class ExtendClass extends MyClass {
> >> > foo(){ ??? }
> >> > bar(){ return `extended bar`; }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > // Elsewhere
> >> > myRunner = (classInstance) => `${classInstance.foo()} ::
> >> > ${classInstance.bar()}`;
> >> >
> >> > myRunner(myClassInstance);
> >> > myRunner(extendedClassInstance);
> >> > ```
> >> >
> >> > Decorations would be good for classes, but don't work for regular
> >> > methods.
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sold we need new syntax for this -- I just find myself
> reaching
> >> > for
> >> > the `???` symbol. Especially in a typed language or in any instance
> that
> >> > we
> >> > have a class and extended paradigm, or when you have a prescribed
> >> > "object"
> >> > shape.
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > es-discuss mailing list
> >> > es-discuss@mozilla.org
> >> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss@mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
