> You already can't assume the result is `typeof new function () { return value
> } === "object"`
Yes, that's why I need reliable ways to test whether a value is an object, and
your proposal breaks one of these.
> here's what I usually do:
>
> ```
> function isObject(value) {
> return value != null && (
> typeof value === "object" ||
> typeof value === "function"
> )
> }
No, `typeof` is not reliable, because it's implementation-defined for
non-standard non-callable exotic objects.
For example, old IE used to return `"unknown"` in various cases.
-- Oriol
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
