On 2018-05-06 19:57, Logan Smyth wrote:
<snip>
I think the best source of truth is likely the spec:
https://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/8.0/#sec-number.max_safe_integer
which states
The value of Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER is the largest integer n such that n and n
+ 1 are both exactly representable as a Number value.
Right, this is essentially what I'm claiming; Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1 is a
valid (exact) integer which means that
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7493#section-2.2 is incorrect.
Anders
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
