What specific advantages do you see this new syntax bringing compared to,
say:
```js
var gpi = new Network().typeOf({ starTopology:[[0,1,..],[2,3,..],..] });
var theorem = [ "basenet": [ "supernet": gpi ] ];
```
...or with a sneaky assignment:
```js
var gpi, theorem = [ "basenet": [ "supernet": gpi = new Network().typeOf({
starTopology:[[0,1,..],[2,3,..],..] }) ] ];
```
...which do the same thing?
Does this call on any prior art?
What problems does it solve?
-- T.J. Crowder
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Abdul Shabazz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I would like to see a standard way of inlining javascript.
>
> For example:
>
> gpi <= theorem => basenet => supernet <= new Network().typeOf({
> starTopology:[[0,1,..],[2,3,..],..] }),
>
> is syntactic sugar for:
>
> var theorem = [];
> theorem["basenet"] = [];
> theorem["basenet"]["supernet"] = new Network().typeOf({
> starTopology:[[0,1,..],[2,3,..],..] });
> var gpi = theorem["basenet"]["supernet"];
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
