There's the separate issue that "void" in no way connotes types, so that
word wouldn't likely be acceptable, because it has no relevant meaning.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 10:27 PM, YU HengChun <achun....@qq.com> wrote:
> You mean this...
>
> The original:
>
> ```js
> function f(x) {
> return typeof x !== 'string' || typeof x === 'undefined';
> }
> ```
>
> The proposal:
>
> ```js
> function f(x = void String) {
> void Boolean; // The complete code should be like this
> return typeof x !== 'string' || typeof x === 'undefined';
> }
> ```
>
> Thank you, you actually provided an example to prove that the proposal is
> conflict-free.
>
> Test code is casually written, the results of these two versions will be
> consistent.
>
>
> 我得谢谢你的关注(真的, 这样才可以有更多的验证).
> 你刚好提供了一个例子证明我的提案是无冲突的.
> 随便写测试代码吧, 这两个版本的结果完全一致.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
