> Personally I think the JSON WG should be rebooted but apparently I'm rather alone with that idea.
You're not alone in wanting to see the JSON WG get back to work. I'd also like to see the addition of a syntax for serializing recursive structures. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:32 AM Anders Rundgren < [email protected]> wrote: > On 2018-07-24 12:27, kai zhu wrote: > > tldr - tc39 should focus more on JSON-friendly > javascript-language-features instead of wasting-time on hard-to-serialize > classes/meta-programming. > > JSON isn't really a topic for tc39 only but since the IETF consider JSON > "done", an open question is where possible future developments should take > place, including dealing with new data types like BigInt. > > Personally I think the JSON WG should be rebooted but apparently I'm > rather alone with that idea. > > Obvious extensions include comments and dropping the "" requirement on > keys that are JS compliant. > > Anders > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
