On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 00:09, Logan Smyth <loganfsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might help if you could clarify how your proposal diverges from the
> class fields proposal that you linked to. From purely a syntactic view,
> ignoring the type annotations, I don't see an obvious difference, so it is
> hard to tell what your expectations are. You state "I have shown the idea
> of declaring subobject default value declarations.", but I can't actually
> tell what that means or what you intended to show. Is
> ```
> defaults = {
> a: 1,
> b: 2
> }
> ```
> meant to create a property called `defaults`, or do something else?
>
That and the syntax.
Aaron
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
