What would it report on `obj` with `const a = {}; const obj = { a };`? What
about with `const obj = { get a() { return Math.random() > 0.5 ? obj : {};
} };`?This seems like something you could do yourself as a function. On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 7:30 AM Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there other use cases for this? This reason doesn't really seem > compelling. > > (Not TC39, but I wouldn't expect this to be considered without a way > stronger use case.) > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:45 Oliver Dunk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I’d love to see some sort of `maxDepth` property on objects. >> >> For `{}`, it would return `0`. >> In the case of `{keyOne: true}`, it would return `1`. >> For `{keyOne: {anotherKey: false}, keyTwo: false}`, it would return `2`. >> >> My particular use case is validating a JSON payload sent by a user to >> prevent abuse. I don’t want to force a particular structure or set of keys, >> but I do want to make sure the level of nesting doesn’t get silly. >> >> The code to implement this is fairly short, but looks a bit messy. It’d >> be really nice to have a property instead. >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
