Not sure what the benefit here is: - You can do `foo: () => bar` for objects - You can do `foo = () => bar` for class instances using the public fields proposal.
This leaves out self-binding, but you could always use a local variable if necessary. (It's like one extra line, maybe 3, and it's not common at all.) On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 15:09 Sultan <[email protected]> wrote: > The missing colon ":" is intentional. > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:57 PM J Decker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:23 AM Sultan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> As the name suggests; An update to the grammar related to methods on >>> objects/classes to support arrow methods: >>> >>> today: {render() { return 'Hello' }} >>> proposed addition: {render() => 'Hello'} >>> >>> proposed addition: {render:() => 'Hello'} >> >> >>> This could be some-what linked to class fields in the class variant; >>> That is what does "this" refer to when used in a class. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
