@Ranando
I think you meant:
```js
F({par1, par2, ..., parN}) {
Object.assign(this, arguments);
}
```
This is briefly explained on github, anyway you'll get an undesired
'length' property.
Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 22:20 Ranando King <[email protected]>
ha scritto:
> What about this:
>
> ```js
> F({par1, par2, ..., parN}) {
> Object.assign(this, arguments[0]);
> }
> ```
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:20 PM Simo Costa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> @Claude
>>
>> Your suggestion is still too much verbose/ripetitive in my opinion
>> because you repeat the `this`keyword. I agree with the "limited use cases"
>> of my proposal but not with your concerns about the syntax, but I am open
>> for improvements on it.
>> I do not think that it could bring more mistuderstading than the
>> introduction of the rest/spread syntax has brought.
>>
>> And about the Object.assign solution, there are always (theoretically)
>> an object creation and a function call, as well as the repetition of the
>> parameters.
>> `Object.assign(this, {x, y});`
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
