Your imagined syntax would suggest to me that the constructor had 5 arguments, not 3 - it seems strange to me to have "x" and "a" be implicitly two ways to refer to the same thing.
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:56 AM dante federici <[email protected]> wrote: > Any reason we can't consider a scala-like constructor? > > ```js > class Point(x, y) { > toString() { > return `(${this.x},${this.y})` > } > } > > console.log(`??? ${new Point(1, 2)}`); // ??? 1,2 > ```` > > Doesn't conflict with existing syntax, it's clear, and you can still > shorthand most data-classes or structs to just: > ``` > class MyData(some, props, here) {} > ``` > > I imagine this as the syntax: > ``` > class Point(x, y) { // implicits x, y as first two args of constru > constructor(a, b, c) { > this.z = a + b + c; > console.log(this.x, this.y, this.c); // values of: a, b, c > console.log(this.x === a, this.y === b); // true, true > } > } > ``` > > And de-sugared: > ``` > class Point { > constructor(a, b, c) { > this.x = a; > this.y = b; > // rest of body > this.z = a + b + c; > } > } > ``` > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
