Ah, this thread got forked from the other one, which has a code sample. Taking a look at that...
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 10:29 PM #!/JoePea <[email protected]> wrote: > > I never knew any of all that stuff you have all mentioned, and as an > end user, I don't think I would ever need to know. To me, I use > `window` as a global object, and it has never been more than that. > > I've never written any sort of code that can prove or verify any of > what you all are talking about. Mind showing code samples? > > If a sample of code isn't possible, or if to the end user there's > really just some single global object as far as their code is > concerned, then "global object" is in fact a good name. That's why I'd > like to see how what has been said actually manifests itself in > end-user code. > > On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 1:43 PM Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 10/6/19 2:58 PM, Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă wrote: > > > Also let's not forget that the WindowProxy behavior contradicts the JS > > > object model in that the non-configurable 'something' own property of > > > the window proxy is removed. > > > > There is a proposal for addressing that. Firefox has been shipping it > > in Nightly for a while, but we have seen zero interest from any other > > browsers for addressing that issue... > > > > See https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/688#issuecomment-430648819 and > > following comments for the details of the proposal. > > > > -Boris > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
