Promise.all(Object.values(myObjWithPromiseValues)).then(...) On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:22 AM Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote:
> The current API accepts an *iterable*, which means any object that has > `Symbol.iterator`, such as an array or a Set. > > Throwing when it receives a non-iterable object is an important tool to > catch bugs. If Promise.all was made to accept a non-iterable object as > well, I suspect many bugs would go uncaught. > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:15 AM Adam Eisenreich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Back when async/await was introduced I struggeled quite a bit with >> promises arrays that have conditional promises. RxJS is moving from array >> only support in theirs operators to objects too, there seems to be an >> actual trend going on. Is there any reason against? >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
