I proposed it a long time ago https://esdiscuss.org/topic/ignoring-arguments
but I agree with Tab Atkins nowadays, it would hurt readability On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 9:34 AM Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> wrote: > I tend to agree and one thing I like in good code is "glanceability" - > > the ability to "glance" and see what's going on. > > If I have > > doStuff(bar,, foo,, far) > > vs > > doStuff(bar, foo,, far) > > they don't look too different, but really they are. I normally break > params into separate lines so I wouldn't have this problem, but there's the > risk overall. > > I like that a motivational factor for introducing a language feature is > "reducing the likelihood of bugs", and in my mind this one seems to very > slightly increase it > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 18:49, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:06 AM manuelbarzi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > ``` >> > fun('a', 'b',, 'd',, 'f') >> > ``` >> >> While this does technically match up with arrays, I find the the array >> behavior unreadable and unintuitive (especially with the exception for >> the final comma), and I'd prefer that syntax quirk not spread to other >> list-like syntax constructs. >> >> Passing `undefined` is simply and easy enough; if it's too long you >> can shave off three characters by spelling it `void 0`. Or put a `var >> _;` at the top of your script and use that. >> >> ~TJ >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
