Still better to discuss it there - it's highly related to your suggestion. And I'm pretty sure an issue already exists related to that.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 09:06 Sultan <[email protected]> wrote: > The pattern matching proposal does not handles the mentioned case: > > switch(type) { case 0...5: } being the equivalent of switch(type) { case > 0: case 1: case 2: case 3: case 4: case 5: } > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:36 PM Bruno Macabeus <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I agree with Oriol. >> We already have the proposal pattern matching, that has a very similar >> effect. >> I think that is better to improve pattern matching proposal in order to >> be able to match using ranges (or at least check if it's good to do) >> instead of create a new proposal. >> >> On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 14:08, Oriol _ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This sounds like https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching >>> >>> El 31/1/20 a les 10:57, Sultan ha escrit: >>> >>> For example, the following: >>> >>> switch (value) { >>> case 0...9: break >>> case 'a'...'z': break >>> } >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing >>> [email protected]https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- ----- Isiah Meadows [email protected] www.isiahmeadows.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
