On Oct 30, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > By the way, I think the discussions about language size could benefit > from some quantitative data. I think the following comparisons would > be interesting: > > 1) Size of the ES4 grammar relative to the ES3 grammar (say, by count > of productions).
Excluding the lexical grammar, the E4X syntax rules (which won't be a normative requirement) and regular expression syntax, I count: ECMA-262 3rd Edition: 74 grammar productions ECMAScript 4th edition draft: 197 grammar productions That's a more than 2x increase in surface syntax (2.66x to be more exact). While not completely unreasonable given all the new features, it seems a little high. Before embarking on this exercise I thought that 2x would be a reasonable level of core syntax increase. Part of this may be simply due to better factoring of the grammar, and due to capturing features like auto semicolon insertion, how if is disambiguated, noin contexts, etc in more detail. A lot of the genuinely new stuff just seems to be fallout from the type system. I notice some seemingly duplicate features that will perhaps become more clear on closer reading of the spec. For instance I see all three of namespace, package and unit productions in the grammar. With my limited imagination it's hard to think of how those could be three interestingly different features. > 2) Size of the ES4 standard library by count of classes, methods and > properties. I'll try to look at this soon, too. I think 4-5x would be about the size that would not raise any red flags for me, given how impoverished the ES3 standard library is. Does anyone else have other ideas for objective metrics of language size? Regards, Maciej _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
