On Nov 11, 2007 1:34 AM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Got your back here ;-). Narcissus (http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/ > source/js/narcissus/) wants this too, and it's going to end up > falling out of the reflection APIs: > > reflect::typeOf(this).reflect::construct(arguments) > > or of course: > > { use namespace reflect; > . . . typeOf(this).constructo(arguments) } >
+1 eden want this too :) http://edenrr.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/as3/src/buRRRn/eden/ECMAScript.as in there I got a scanFunction() that need to be able to switch between a simple function call with arguments or a contructor call with arguments, at runtime so 2 follow up questions about the reflect namespace is something as var str = "some.thing::MyClass"; var c:Class = getObjectFromString( str ); //maybe a use of eval here ? var instance:* = eflect::typeOf( c ).reflect::construct(arguments); can work ? ]> in your example. The http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php? > id=proposals:meta_objects proposal is out of date, it uses iterators > for the type and value parameters, but IIRC we have agreement to > satisfy your use-case. See http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ticket/232. > and then the second question, is the meta objects and reflect namespace are optionnal ? some months ago I remember they were but now in the wiki page I see "This proposal is to amend the spec with a normative set of meta-objects which must be present in any program and accessible at runtime." but as the page is out of date, just wondering cheers, zwetan _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
