Hi, new here. On Nov 12, 2007 2:22 PM, Jonathan Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> use readonly error > >>> > >>> or perhaps > >>> > >>> use readonly throw > >>> > >>> We try to make pragmas more readable, sometimes with an extra word; > >>> not sure this is the best way to phrase it still, but the idea would > >>> be to enable throwing of a ReadOnlyError on assignment to a ReadOnly > >>> property. Comments? > >> Why not just: > >> > >> use ReadOnlyError > > > > Sure -- pragma convention so far has been terse and lower-case, e.g. > > 'use strict' or 'use decimal ...'. > > I'm not sure what maintaining case convention gives you here. Using |use > ReadOnlyError| is about as intuitive and easy to remember as it could be I > think.
Since the existing pragma directives are all single words, they could be camel-humped or underscored for all we know. Actually, no, I guess there's "use xml namespace [string or Namespace object]", which might suggest "use error [Class reference or object]". The latter could be used for other types of errors as well. -- T. Michael Keesey Director of Technology Exopolis, Inc. 2894 Rowena Avenue Ste. B Los Angeles, California 90039 http://exopolis.com/ -- http://3lbmonkeybrain.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
