>> JSON: Sounds good. > This proposal is withdrawn and another API is being considered for > reinclusion later. See http:;//json.org/json2.js. toJSONString and parseJSON are going away? I was actually wanting to write and suggest the removal of these, with Douglas's recent change in his JSON API. I am glad to see these will be going away. Will ES4 include the other API (JSON.parseJSON / JSON.stringify)?
>You miss the main difference: structural types are not equated by name, so >they avoid the inheritance trap of classes, which consists I would love to understand the purpose of structural types better. I don't understand how base class evolution is constrained in ways that super record types aren't. I also don't understand how the goal of applying types to existing ES3 objects can not be achieved with wrap operator and nominal types. I know there something I am missing here. Thanks, Kris _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
