What about the actual content sections? We want the same look and feel over the text -- what perspectives do you need covered in describing a feature. Do you have a sample?
Michael Graydon Hoare wrote: > Brendan Eich wrote: > >>>>> I'll start the ball rolling with writing up some notes on Program >>>>> Units, use unit and unit dependencies. Brendan/Jeff: what format >>>>> would you like these notes in? >>>> >>> >>> You missed this question above. >> >> No, I ducked :-). Lars is editor with Jeff assisting and (as always) >> maintaining the grammar; I would appreciate Graydon's thoughts too. > > *Shrug* I'm not picky. I think Lars has been working more in HTML, and > that's what I hope most of the spec-writing will happen in, just > because it's real easy to render, edit, version control and such. But > plaintext or some flavour of wikitext is also convenient. Word docs > less so, though I think they're the final target form ECMA wants. And > of course there are our more academic members who feel more at home in > LaTeX. Whatever floats your boat. It's relatively easy to > interconvert, either way. > > -Graydon > > _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
