Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the decision to not support E4X in ES4. Would this decision not Break The Web, as E4X has been an integral part of SpiderMonkey for a long time?
Anyway, what advantage does the hiding of the prefix and name properties have? Shouldn't we at least be aware of possible E4X users on the Web, and stay as compliant to E4X, even if ES4 does not support E4X? FYI: Adobe products are not The Web (but Flash is), but they integrate either ActionScript, SpiderMonkey or ExtendScript, and all languages support E4X. Michael ---------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lars Hansen Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 5:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: ES4 draft: Namespace Namespace objects represent reflected namespaces. Here's the (short) draft spec. Comments welcome. --lars _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
