> -----Original Message----- > From: Waldemar Horwat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10. mars 2008 19:40 > To: Lars Hansen > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ES4 draft: Object > > Lars Hansen wrote: > > The feature was approved by the WG and solves a practical problem. > > If another way to solve this practical problem is proposed > (in a more > > structured form than in the ongoing discussion) and finds > favor with > > the WG, then fine -- of course we can replace it. Until then, this > > feature stays as it is until the WG can be convinced that > it needs to > > be removed. Personally I think that "it is ugly/abhorrent" > > is a weak basis on which to remove the current feature. > > We are the WG. Are you saying that substantive discussions > of your proposals are not welcome? Not sure what the point > of participating is if that's the case.
Sorry, I didn't realize that "I find it abhorrent" qualified as substantive discussion. My fault. Won't happen again. > I'm dealing with a serious insurrection of folks who believe > that the ES4 working group has a bad attitude, based on > Brendan's public comments and responses to issues like this > one. They're quite visible. Debate is only good. I merely pointed out the obvious thing, namely that until there is an alternative proposal written up to deal with this issue, the current design stands unless the WG, as a group, decides to just get rid of it (leaving the problem it was designed to solve solution-less). I like the idea of making non-public-namespaced properties be not-enumerable and getting rid of DontEnum. We've talked loosely about it for a while. But it's remained loose talk, it has never made it to the stage where it is a coherent proposal. --lars _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
