On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
> On 3/20/08, Lars Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing some of these out, Brendan did the same. This is
>> already legal to define catch-alls:
>>
>> { var meta::get: function () { ... } }
>
> Is there a more recent version of the grammar than the docs at
> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:normative_grammar ?
Jeff Dyer will field this part, I'm sure.
> This syntax isn't legal according to the grammar there, nor is it
> recognized by the RI.
See http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ticket/225 and please fix this if you
are willing ;-). I took a stab at adding a FIELD_NAME type, I can
mail you my patch if you are interested. It was a while ago and won't
merge perfectly. We need namespace-qualified property names in object
initialisers for record types as well as object initialisers, for
iterators and generators.
/be
_______________________________________________
Es4-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
