2008/5/14 Mike Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok. So it's a content-type which is not a mime-type even though it looks > like one? > Is there a separate recommendation that defines a mime-type for ecmascript?
<uri:http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4329.txt> -- David "liorean" Andersson _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
