> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark S. Miller > Sent: 13. juni 2008 19:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: ES3.1 Draft: 11 June 2008 version available > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Brendan Eich > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Reformed with" was an attempt to restore lexical scope by > exact type > > annotation. That's what people voted down, not the ES1-3 > "with" statement. > > I'm confused. Aren't we talking about "reformed with"?
Dead for a long time, now. > What > other "with" do people imagine is compatible with strict > mode? I must have missed something. The one in ES3. What makes it not compatible with strict mode? --lars _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
