On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:01:26 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To be clear, I propose this rule not to block ES3.1, but to make it > successful. The WebKit project will accept patches for any feature of > 3.1 that has been reconciled with 4, and we will likely devote Apple > resources to implementing such features as well, so SquirrelFish will > likely be a candidate for one of the interoperable implementations. > Mozilla also has an extensive test suite for ECMAScript 3rd edition, > which could be a good starting point for an ES3.1 test suite. > > I also note that the strong version of the interoperable > implementations rule will be an even higher hurdle for ES4. > > Any comments?
From experience with other specifications, requiring two interoperable implementations does sound like a good idea. Especially if they are Web browsers so compatibility can be tested. It also means that once the specification ships authors can actually use it. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/> _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
