On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Michael Haufe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So let me see if I understand this argument correctly.
I generally agree with what you've written here -- just a couple of comments... > If I want the benefits of this blocking, does that mean I have to give > up some of my shorthand? > > (a === b) ? true : false; > > How would the block work in this case? Not sure what you're getting at here. What block are you referring to? > > The JavaScript 1.7 let statement is already the better block we need, > and instead of being a generic solution like the one you've suggested, > it has flexibility and doesn't force me to change the way I already code > things: I'm partial to the let statement, too, but you should know that it's not being proposed for either ES3.1 or ES4. But yes, it makes the scope of the let-bound variables perfectly clear -- let vs. let* binding semantics aside. (Does the JS1.7 let statement bind sequentially or in parallel?) -Jon _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list Es4-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
