Thank you for your clear and to-the-point reply. I'll make a /much/ shorter response.
For some reason I find brevity very difficult to attain. But I'll discipline and restrain my verbosity. Ingvar Brendan Eich wrote: > On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Ingvar von Schoultz wrote: > >> Regarding my explanations quoted below, did they clarify >> things? > > No, and I don't have time right now to deal with the great number of > words you have dedicated to promoting your ideas. This is a shame, > since you could have a point, but I simply can't expend the effort to > try to find it given other priorities. Sorry, this is not something > I'm happy about, but it's not entirely due to my being busy (i.e., > it's not just me -- it's you :-/). > > May I suggest using fewer words when replying than you have? > Generally proportionate responses would be best. I'm assuming fair > play, i.e., that people are not resorting to too short and dismissive > a style of replying. I'm not doing that here, I'm just letting you > know I don't have time to plow through what you have written. Maybe > someone else on the list has the time. > > /be > > _______________________________________________ > Es4-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss > -- Ingvar von Schoultz ------- (My quirky use of capitals in code comes from my opinion that reserved and predefined words should all start with lowercase, and user-defined should all start with uppercase, because this will easily and elegantly prevent a host of name-collision problems when things like programming languages are upgraded with new labels.) _______________________________________________ Es4-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
