Eric

Thanks very much for the patches.

I'm sorry to load you with our process, but we can only accept patches 
that are attached to a JIRA with the "Grant License" checkbox ticked.

If you could please create a JIRA and attach these files to that, we 
would really appreciate it!

Thanks
Paul

Hubert, Eric wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I started looking at the code and found out, that our requirement of
> separating the configuration from the server code and using n different
> configurations with one server installation can not be met with the
> current code base.
> 
> Generally I'm also not a fan of dozens of System Properties, but in this
> case a single property to control the configuration location seems to be
> worth from my point of view.
> 
> To demonstrate my ideas I attached small patches against the 1.7-tag of
> WSO2 ESB. While this patch should also keep the existing behaviour, it
> shall allow a user to separate all important configuration files from
> the webapp and thus enable him to use n different configurations with
> one ESB installation.
> 
> There are currently some limitations though:
> - identity.jks, trust.jks and ui-extensions-config.xml need to stay in 
>   webapp/WEB-INF/classes/conf due to some other code dependencies.
> - context.xml, tomcat-users.xml, and web.xml need to stay in tomcat/conf
> 
> But all important config files can reside in any location specified via
> system property esb.config.dir
> 
> Other existing system properties like synapse.xml or axis2.xml have of
> course precedence of this property, but this property (if existing) has
> precedence over init parameters from web.xml.
> 
> esb.config.dir needs to be further added to classpath instead of
> webapp/WEB-INF/classes/conf and tomcat/conf
> 
> I didn't try, but it should be sufficient to put esb.config.dir in
> CLASSPATH before calling the wso-esb-domain.sh, as the wrapper takes the
> current classpath as the first entry of it's classpath definition.
> 
> 
> Asankha, what do you think? Do you see better ways to achieve this goal?
> Having to hack in a bunch of files in webapp/WEB-INF/classes/conf and
> tomcat/conf can't be the best configuration approach. 
> 
> This way I currently use a template approach where I put placeholders in
> all the splattered configuration files and are able to configure
> everything in one central file. Before each startup I copy the filled
> templates to a central configuration place and let the WSO2 ESB use
> these. It's really comfortable, no more digging in axis2.xml,
> tomcat.properties, synapse.properties, server.xml, log4j.properties, and
> wrapper conf just to configure ports or manage other important settings.
> 
> I would be happy if these changes or something serves the same purpose
> would find it's way to your source repo.
> 
> Regards,
>    Eric
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> We are generally going to drop use of system properties as much as
> possible in future, but may keep core properties for backwards
> compatibility. This is because System properties generally creates
> issues at deployment time..
> 
> However, I am fully open to evaluating suggestions for improvement, and
> if we could capture a proposal as an enhancement request on our JIRA, we
> will certainly look at the posibilities
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Esb-java-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/esb-java-dev

-- 
Paul Fremantle
CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
VP, Apache Synapse

Office: +44 844 484 8143
Cell: +44 798 447 4618

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

_______________________________________________
Esb-java-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/esb-java-dev

Reply via email to