On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 14:12 +0200, Jens Goldhammer wrote: > Hello Amila, > > thanks for the hints and good work of the documentation. I have looked > at the persistence paper and especially at the "restore store after a > crash"-section. > BUT: In my mind mercury will not be used in big projects due to the > limitations to inout-operations-persistence on last page!! > Do you see any chance for implementing this in future?
As I have given there are some practical limitations on implementing this feature. So we are investigating the possible ways of implementing this. > > Example: If I want to restart the server and this will lead to lost of > all pending messages of an in-out-conversation, this will not lead to > big acceptance in the user-world! I see the spec ws-rm especially in > this field. I know that there is not said something about persistence, > but I think realibility expresses something of saving messages like in a > jms queue. Furthermore, it should prevent to loose messages if the > network is down and you cannot send the messages- this will work. It is > not good if any message will get lost in the communication. Maybe there > is an extension point to put them in a message store which will be > implemented by Ruwan. > > Sorry for these words, but it only describes my opinion. no problem many thanks for your response. thanks, Amila. > > Thanks, > Jens > > amila chinthaka suriarachchi schrieb: > > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:19 +0200, Jens Goldhammer wrote: > > > >> Hello Paul, > >> > >> thanks for the information. Is there any documentation available for > >> trying it? > >> > > you can find a user guide from this location. > > https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/commons/mercury/modules/docs > > > > and also there are some test case can be found from here. > > https://svn.wso2.org/repos/wso2/trunk/commons/mercury/modules/test > > > > Here it is assumed that you have a good Axis2 knowledge and can try this > > with RC3. > > > > http://people.apache.org/~dims/axis2-1.4/RC3/axis2-642657-bin.zip > > > > thanks, > > Amila. > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> Jens > >> > >> Paul Fremantle schrieb: > >> > >>> Jens > >>> > >>> Mercury is a re-architecture of Sandesha. We are just about to take > >>> this to Apache and offer it to be a next revision of the Sandesha > >>> module. So we will see how this works out. At the moment this is still > >>> an experimental option, but we hope it to be more stable and > >>> performant than Sandesha in the long term. > >>> > >>> Paul > >>> > >>> Jens Goldhammer wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> can you tell me something to mercury? Why is there another > >>>> implementation of WS-RM? > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Jens > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Esb-java-user mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/esb-java-user > >>>> > >>>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Esb-java-user mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/esb-java-user > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ Esb-java-user mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/esb-java-user
