Hi Matt, Looping in the ESLint mailing list (this is where questions such as these should be sent).
Can you explain more about what you need? -N On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Matthew Adamson < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Nicholas, > > Sonar is a system which keeps an eye on all seven axes of code quality and > allows tight control between violations ( issues in esLint ) and the > developer responsible for them. It also helps track new violations added > over time through differential analysis. > > I'm actually thinking of developing a new Sonar plug in which integrates > with esLint to feed issues from generated from the system with Sonar. This > would allow the violations to be managed through Sonar through standard > means here > > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SONAR/Violations+and+Reviews > > Perhaps you'd be interested in helping with some thoughts. I can generate > a sensor which captures an esLint JSON formatted file generated from > > https://github.com/sindresorhus/eslint-json > > However Sonar relies on feeding the system with the existing rules e.g. js > lint defined the rules in an XML file, other systems also contain XML > definitions. Can you think of a good way to capture all rule definitions > from esLint. We then need to map these fields to Sonar e.g. severity of > esLint issue, description and rule key. > > Matt > > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:52:14 -0800 > Subject: Re: From Web Site: Question about article > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > Hi Matt, > > I've not used Sonar, so I'm afraid I'm not familiar with its capabilities. > I could easily see it being used in conjunction with ESLint. I would > describe ESLint as a much lower-level tool and Sonar as a much higher-level > one. > > -N > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Matt Adamson <[email protected] > > wrote: > > From: Matt Adamson <[email protected]> > Subject: Question about article > > Message Body: > Hi Nicholas, > > I read with interest your articles on ESLint and also the maintainable > Javascript book. > > Currently we use Sonar to measure the seven axes of quality in our > projects which use a number of technologies including Java , Javascript and > JSP. However recently we've favoured using ESLint for local and CI JS > validation. Sonar also provides coding rule validation through its own > plug in with no support for ESLint. > > The Sonar Javascript plug in however also measures complexity, commenting > , duplication and design issues. It tracks this over time so it's easy to > answer questions on whether a project has got better in certain areas and > if not where e.g. modules / packages. They can then focus their efforts > accordingly. > > Do you have much experience with Sonar? Do you use this in conjuction with > ESLint in organisations? Perhaps together? > > Appreciate your thoughts > > Thanks > > Matt > > -- > This mail is sent via contact form on NCZOnline > http://www.nczonline.net/blog > > > > > -- > > ______________________________ > Nicholas C. Zakas > @slicknet > > Author, Professional JavaScript for Web Developers > Buy it at Amazon.com: > http://www.amazon.com/Professional-JavaScript-Developers-Nicholas-Zakas/dp/1118026691/ref=sr_1_3 > -- ______________________________ Nicholas C. Zakas @slicknet Author, Professional JavaScript for Web Developers Buy it at Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Professional-JavaScript-Developers-Nicholas-Zakas/dp/1118026691/ref=sr_1_3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ESLint" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
