Hi Pablo, I have already got WordWeb 6 the free version installed on my machine! What a surprise that it launched very fast! The tabs aligned horizontally on its interface, from left to right, are WordWeb, Wikipedia, Wiktionary, WordWeb Online, zh.wikipedia, and zh.wiktionary. Whoa, how could it know I need the last two tabs? Did it check my windows language settings? And I am curious what happened to yours?
Happy all the time! Rui 2009/12/14 Pablo <[email protected]> > Hi Rui, > > I hope you are fine, > > > Chrome lately, that's the good news. By the way, the spelling check? As I > > have been told, the Google Toolbar for Firefox have the same feature, > have > > you used it? However, it's weird that this toolbar is not compatible with > > I've tried but I uninstalled it. I just keep visible my own toolbar ;) > and keep hidden other two or three ones I use not so often. When I > need them, I just make them visible and hide them again when are not > needed. Space is valuable especially for small displays, isn't it? > > Once I tried Chrome with my (closed) blog and surprisingly it didn't > work. Well, I think Google improvements will be very fast and the gap > with Firefox can be made smaller and smaller over time. > > > It seems that Google try to make cloud computing widespread! I can see > that > > in the future every computing will be done online! What we will need is a > > single brower(I am not sure we can call it brower when that age coming, > > maybe we should call it client or even OS) :) > > We'll see! Have a good time! > > Pablo > > > > > > Beautiful Day! > > > > Rui > > > > 2009/12/14 Pablo <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi Rui and all, > > > > > On Dec 13, 1:11 am, Rui Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Pablo, Thank you for your reply! > > > > > > I would like to say there are two points we need to draw attention > to: > > > > > > Point.1: An add-on or a standalone. > > > > > > Those add-ons depend on what version and what kind of browers you > use, so > > > > once you get your favorite brower upgraded or get an alternative, > > > probably > > > > the add-ons would not work smoothly or even not work at all. I prefer > a > > > > independent assistant tool, in this case, it could be helpful the > whole > > > time > > > > no matter what you use to surf the net. > > > > > You are right. It's necessary to have standalone options as well. And > > > often extensions are updated and some of them sometimes get broken > > > because doesn't work anymore with new versions of Firefox, but perhaps > > > just the minority and often you just get alternatives. Well, I think > > > it depends on the computer skills of learners, but it's not so hard. > > > Once you get to know how a extension is installed and get updated, > > > it's the same for rest of them. And for me there are two or three > > > points that I found important in the dictionaries or English software: > > > (1) response time, I mean the immediateness of the response (2) the > > > quality and completeness (3) the usability: the presentation (colors, > > > density of texts, etc) and easinesses for the user. > > > > > About standalone options. I've posted here some months ago about > > > software such as WordWeb and The Sage, both based on the WordNet > > > lexical database. Recently I installed the last version of WordWeb (v. > > > 6), and each time is getting better (and not bloated). Now there is > > > the option 'search as you type' and includes UK and US > > > pronunciations. WordWeb has both a mechanical voice for any word, and > > > human voices (from volunteers) for most of the words (not for every > > > one). To look up a word, you simply press [Ctrl+Alt+W] and you get a > > > pop-up window with definitions, synonyms, pronunciations, and more. > > > > > Well, as I'm typing, I'm using the spelling add-ons of Firefox. > > > Overal, for the time being, I found Firefox and its add-ons let me > > > have a pleasant 'user experience'. It's not perfect, well, any browser > > > is 'perfect' ;) sometimes we are forced to use IExplorer or others ;) > > > > > It's clear we need both standalone and online tools too. I've just > > > been talking about no cost, free options. > > > > > > Point.2: Working online or offline. > > > > > > It is obvious that the age we live in is all about network, almost > > > > everything we installed on our computer or mobile device need the > network > > > > connection. Just because of this, we will screw if we are not so > lucky to > > > > have a nice network state. On the other side, if we get something > that > > > > combined the two solutions, half online half offline, I mean, to > store > > > the > > > > databases of some basic dictionaries on our local disk, so we could > find > > > the > > > > basic explaination instantly without any net connection, at the same > time > > > we > > > > still have the access to more details by getting online. > > > > > > I try to make myself clear! > > > > Point out any mistakes(spelling/grammar) if you like. > > > > Any comments are welcome! > > > > > Well, I keep expecting for good news from Google, I mean, for software > > > that works on-line and off-line ;) Seriously, I think every time we > > > have more software and options available, especially on-line. > > > > > > Have a good day Pablo and All! > > > > > Thank you, the same for you and all! > > > > > Pablo > > > > > > 2009/12/13 Pablo < [email protected]> > > > > > > > Hi Rui, thanks for the reply, > > > > > > > > one! Since I began to use Google Wave, I have already changed my > > > brower > > > > > from > > > > > > Firefox to Chrome, so to say, what I need now is a musthave tool > for > > > > > Chrome, > > > > > > > I know both Chrome and IExplorer support also extensions, but > perhaps > > > > > we need to await for a long time until we have a big variety of > them, > > > > > similar to Firefox, which is currently leading in this field, and > as > > > > > far as I know, for a wide margin. > > > > > > > > but I have not find a proper one yet. The way I translate English > > > word of > > > > > > web page is to go to English dictionary online like > > > > > dictionary.reference.com, > > > > > > > That's a good point in favor of Dictionary.com and good for us :) > > > > > > > > which have the feature of pronouncing too, also, have the ability > to > > > > > > pronounce 'slept'. :))) However, it's just not as convenient as a > > > > > brower's > > > > > > add-on. > > > > > > > About pronunciation of texts on web pages, I've been trying these > add- > > > > > ons: foxlite, foxvox, foxvox2 an myvocal. The first three are from > > > > > the same author. I think I will stick to foxvox because it works > off- > > > > > line, although the quality of the voice is not the best. > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > Pablo > > > > > > > > 2009/12/12 Pablo <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Pronounce an English word, according to the author, using > services > > > > > > > from Merriam-Webster. > > > > > > > > >https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1689 > > > > > > > > > Just install the add-on, restart Firefox, and hear the > > > pronunciation > > > > > > > of each wanted word (on a web page), highlighting or double > > > clicking > > > > > > > it, and selecting the option 'Pronounce' from the contextual > menu. > > > > > > > > >http://myenglishtoolbar.wikispaces.com/Pronounce+add-on > > > > > > > > > The add-on is not perfect, it doesn't pronounce words from text > > > boxes > > > > > > > (as I realize), neither from irregular verbal inflections, e.g. > it > > > > > > > doesn't pronounce 'slept', only 'sleep'. Anyway, I think is a > > > must- > > > > > > > have tool for English learners. > > > > > > > > > Enjoy! > > > > > > > > > Pablo > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > > Groups > > > > > > > "ESL Podcast". > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to: > [email protected] > > > > > just > > > > > > > reply this message > > > > > > > For invite your friends, visit: > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/eslpodcast/members_invite > > > > > > > Know how help us, visit this FAQ at: > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/eslpodcast/web/ > > > frequently-asked-questions > > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > Groups > > > > > "ESL Podcast". > > > > > To post to this group, send email to: [email protected] > > > just > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ESL Podcast". > To post to this group, send email to: [email protected] or just > reply this message > For invite your friends, visit: > http://groups.google.com/group/eslpodcast/members_invite > Know how help us, visit this FAQ at: > http://groups.google.com/group/eslpodcast/web/frequently-asked-questions > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ESL Podcast". To post to this group, send email to: [email protected] or just reply this message For invite your friends, visit: http://groups.google.com/group/eslpodcast/members_invite Know how help us, visit this FAQ at: http://groups.google.com/group/eslpodcast/web/frequently-asked-questions
