Anne / Mrinal, Can you then start with some work on the existing HTML/CSS files in the Apache SVN repo to make it look more like Mrinal's UI? I recommend changing little & often, so that we stay reasonably in sync - it will probably just be the three of us updating those HTML files for the next few weeks.
Of course, this means we are producing an intermediary UI after all - just one that is based on Mrinal's code... :-) Anne - have you submitted an iCLA yet? We will need to have you enabled as a committer. Until then, it's probably best for you to send patches to Mrinal. Cheers, Darren >That would be awesome! > >I am all for >* Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI?. >It makes no sense to me to make an intermediary UI if we can use >Mrinal's UI to bridge the gap. > >A. > >On 7. jan.. 2009, at 11.17, Hirsch, Richard wrote: > >> We could have a Stax-based version up and running quickly. I just >> need the war file from Mrinal. >> >> People who view this version must be made aware that this UI >> probably won't be available after the BillF UI comes. >> >> D. >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Anne Kathrine Petteroe [mailto:[email protected]] >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Jänner 2009 10:59 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Web UI options >> >> >> On 7. jan.. 2009, at 10.32, Vassil Dichev wrote: >> >>> Generally I shouldn't be trusted about UI decisions, but it doesn't >>> seem that working on something that will be discarded shortly will >>> pay >>> off. Any pros for using intermediary UI? >> >> Pros would be that I need a better looking UI for demo purposes. >> First of all I have had an interview lined up for 5 weeks already, >> which I have had to cancel twice because of problems with the COIL >> server. >> Now that the COIL server is no longer there, I don't have an instance >> where I can show off ESME with a better looking UI. >> Not sure for how much longer I can postpone it. >> >> Secondly, my company is very interested in investing in ESME this >> year, but they don't want to take a second look at it until we have a >> more contemporary UI than the current one. I feel it would be a pity >> to throw away a possibility for an investement only because we didn't >> have a UI. >> We don't have any competitors here, so if we really want to, we can >> make it happen. >> >> - Anne >> >>> >>> >>>> * Skip the intermediary Web UI and concentrate on the "BillF" UI? >>> +1 >> > -- [email protected]
