Hi all, On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Hirsch, Richard <[email protected] > wrote:
> I think we need to add details like: which source we used. I'd also like a > note one of the first pages, saying that this ESME version includes a Scala > library that includes a known major bug involving memory allocation which > detrimentally affected the test results. Just to avoid giving others the > ability to take this report and say "Look. ESME is unstable and has poor > performance." ok, will include a page explaining detail the test basis. > > > We also need a simple description of the type of test that were performed - > how many clients, etc. > > The link for the loadtester source code is also incorrect. right, I just need to upload the Eclipse project. > > > Maybe for later tests we do capacity tests where you start with one user > for minutes and then an additional user every 20 seconds up to 50 users and > then have a ramp-down. We could combine this with more complicated test > scenarios to get even better results. yes, this is possible: can provide a changed test script. > > > Otherwise, I think it is a great start and I can't wait to get a released > version so that I can blog about it. > > D. > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Daniel Koller [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Montag, 12. Jänner 2009 15:00 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: ESME Loadtest results for your review > > Hi all, > > I posted the first draft of the loadtest evaluation at > > http://esmeproject.googlecode.com/files/20090111_esmeloadtest_summary2.pdffor > your review. > > Please give me feedback if you miss information in it, or if you think we > should put clearer emphasis on some facts before communicate it > "externally". > > Kind regards, > > Daniel > > -- > --- > Daniel Koller > Jahnstrasse 20 > 80469 München * [email protected] > -- --- Daniel Koller Jahnstrasse 20 80469 München * [email protected]
