On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Hirsch, Richard < [email protected]> wrote:
> What about if we based our fundamental REST API on that of Twitter. We > wouldn't have a ESME REST API with all functionality and then the Twitter > API rather we would have a Twitter API and then a smaller REST API that > would contain functionality not covered by Twitter. > > Thoughts? ESME messages have "more stuff" in them than do Twitter messages. I'd rather have the ESME API and the Twitter API as separate things with separate URLs. > > > D, > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp
