David introduced us to Alexis Richardson who runs the RabbitMQ project 
(http://www.rabbitmq.com/ <http://www.rabbitmq.com/> )  and we had a short  
email exchange about integration posibilitites. RabbitMQ is an open-source 
implementation of AMQP <http://www.rabbitmq.com/faq.html#what-is-amqp> , the 
emerging standard for high performance enterprise messaging. I wanted to move 
the conversation to the esme-dev list to get some ideas and involve everyone.
 
We were discussing possible scenarios, especially regarding federated scenarios 
where multiple ESME servers wish to exchange messages. Lift already has 
RabbitMQ integration 
(http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb/lift-amqp/scaladocs/index.html 
<http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb/lift-amqp/scaladocs/index.html>  )  As 
an aside, I've got to say that I'm always surprised at what Lift already can 
do.  This functionality would probably work well with our planned pool 
functionality. The idea would be that there are some pools that are federated 
across several servers.  Until we have the pool functionality working, I like 
to suggest creating an action that sends a message via AMQP to another ESME 
server. Of course, we'd have to implement a AMQPAddListener to receive the 
messages sent via the action. This way we can learn more about messaging via 
AMQP. My suggestion would be that we create a second Stax instance that can act 
as a receiver to test out these enterprise messaging scenarios. I'm going to 
set up a Jira items to deal with the new action and AMQPAddListener 
implementations. 
 
It appears that there is an expiremental binding for HTTP 
(http://www.rabbitmq.com/download.html#experimental) - maybe that might be a 
first step. We could use the existing HTP action to create a HTTP Message for 
RabbitMQ. 
 
We need a RabbitMQ server to communicate via AMQP, so we can use a public 
hosted by LShift or deploy our own in Stax. Let's use the public one first.
 
By the way, laconica is also looking at using RabbitMQ, so that there is a good 
chance for some interoperability there. 
 
D. 

Reply via email to