My wishlist for a release in June would be:
#52 Add types of authentication besides OpenID
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-52
#16 Unifying server calls (JSON-related)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-16
# 58 CometActor TagCloud.scala - Conversion to JSON
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-58
# 60 Change the Scala code to remove HTML from Track functionality
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-60
# 61 Change the Scala code to remove HTML for Login functionality
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-61
# 62 Change the Scala code to remove HTML for Action functionality
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-62
# 63 Change the Scala code to remove HTML for the specific User-related
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-63
# 59 Better documentation of our existing Scala code
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-59
And of course the UI.
But in order for the UI development to move ahead we need the server-
side developers to remove the HTML in the Scala code first.
My question however is:
Does it make sense if we need to do a rewrite of the existing code?
Shouldn't we try to do the rewrite first?
/Anne
On 9. mai. 2009, at 10.19, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Let's select a few Jira items that we would like to have and run
with them.
I think those Jira items that are very specific and relate to detailed
functionality would probably be the best idea.
Any suggestions for which Jira items to select?
D.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
One of the main things I've seen work successfully in many project
to get
the
community moving as well as attract new developers/users is to get an
actual
release out. There are a lot of people that won't go through the
effort
of
checking out from svn, building, etc.... They want to see an actual
release
to play with.
Thus, my suggestion, would be to set a date for a release (even a
"milestone"
release, like a "0.1" version) and see what can be done before
then. For
example, maybe target June 30th, see what can be put in before
then, and
kind
of run with it. Even if it ends up being "not much different" than
what is
in
SVN right now, it's at least a step forward.
Thoughts?
Are there other ideas that folks have to help get things moving
again?
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
