Why don't you create a new branch. You may have to do some major changes in html code.
D. On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason why I asked is because I was wondering if we should create a new > UI branch so that we can keep the work that Mrinal did based on Bill's work? > > /Anne > > On 7. okt. 2009, at 11.29, Richard Hirsch wrote: > >> I worked on the second version that Mrinal made that was based on >> Bill's ideas. "Worked" -- I tried to adapt the messages page so that >> it worked in lift. I was only partly successful. I would ignore my >> changes to the messages.html page. >> >> The work on the UI that I have recently performed should still work >> with Mrinal's initial version (the one in the screenshots). >> >> D. >> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I also think it would be best if we continued with the first prototype >>> for >>> now. >>> Also because it will only need tweaking of the graphic files we already >>> have. >>> >>> I have created a *very* general Jira-task "Finsih web UI" >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-100 and included it in Release >>> 1.0. >>> There are screenshots of the TechEd prototype as well the mockup of the >>> message screen, mainly so that David can see what we would like to build. >>> >>> Dick, which branch have you worked in when you have done changes to the >>> UI? >>> Mrinal's UI branch? >>> >>> /Anne >>> >>> On 7. okt. 2009, at 10.23, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>> >>>> Mrinal did 2 prototypes - one for the TechEd and one that was based on >>>> Bill's ideas. I'd like to be able to use Mrinal's first prototype for >>>> this first release and then move this UI to the prototype with Bill's >>>> design in the second release. >>>> >>>> What we have to remember is that the first UI prototype was based on >>>> the old ESME where there was little separation between UI and scala >>>> code - this probably will lead to more wor to convert into the new >>>> architecture. >>>> >>>> D. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dick, >>>>> So your suggestion is that we continue with what Mrinal and you have >>>>> worked >>>>> on? >>>>> With the sidebars (and accordion) from Bill's document? >>>>> >>>>> /Anne >>>>> >>>>> On 7. okt. 2009, at 09.22, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Tried and it didn't work :-< >>>>>> >>>>>> We do have the html files now which is the most important thing. >>>>>> >>>>>> D. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Mrinal - downloading now and will deploy soon. >>>>>>> D. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Mrinal Wadhwa >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dick, >>>>>>>> I have a few wars sitting on my server here >>>>>>>> http://experiments.mrinalwadhwa.com/ >>>>>>>> ... not sure what they have >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Mrinal >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Richard Hirsch >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I looked for a working deplyoment with Mrinal's old war file but >>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>> having some trouble - it appears to be broken for some reason >>>>>>>>> (http://esmecloudserver.dickhirsch.staxapps.net/). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've just finished committing a bunch of UI-related changes. I've >>>>>>>>> gotten most of the static strings out of the HTML files and added >>>>>>>>> tons >>>>>>>>> of tabs to beautify our UI. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The message page is still too ugly in my opinion to have a >>>>>>>>> releaseyet. >>>>>>>>> I'd be satisfied with adding tabs for the "Your timeline", "Public >>>>>>>>> Timeline" and "Your followers" and beautifying the stuff on the >>>>>>>>> right >>>>>>>>> hand side. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> D. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:35 AM, David Pollak >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Simple == GoodShipping == Feature >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Let's make it as simple and clean as possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I know we have had this discussion a thousand times before, but >>>>>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> seems >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to be enough of us on the team to make a push towards finishing >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> UI. >>>>>>>>>>> Dave has some time on his hands, and I will try to free up some >>>>>>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>> work this week and next week. At least enough time to finish the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> graphics. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Before we start a push on the UI, I still think we need to agree >>>>>>>>>>> how >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> proceed with it. >>>>>>>>>>> My idea is to do something simple, but functional, and take it >>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> there. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think if we start building "Bill's UI" we will never finish. >>>>>>>>>>> (nothing >>>>>>>>>>> wrong with the design, I am just thinking in terms of the team >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> how >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> time we have available to build a UI) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am thinking something in lines of the UI we built for TechEd >>>>>>>>>>> last >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> year. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dick, do you still have the version with that UI somewhere? If >>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> do, >>>>>>>>>>> could you deploy it to Stax so that Dave can take a look at it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /Anne >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>>>>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>>>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>>>>>> Surf the harmonics >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > >
