OK. >The http adaptor is under a propriatary sun license
Can you include a link to HTTP adaptor? D. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Andy the destroyer <[email protected]> wrote: > I will attach the patch in the morning when I get back to work. I already > made sure the code worked with dpp's code. I used the http adaptor > specifically for stax because I knew it would work. The http adaptor is > under a propriatary sun license.. it might be cool, it might not but it is a > temp solution. > > -Andy > > On Oct 22, 2009 9:14 PM, "Richard Hirsch" <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Andy - you've got to attach the patch to Jira item. For some reasons, > attachments always disappear in mails sent to this list and I need IP > clearance before I can use the code. > >>>This also would remove a dependency and two maven repositories, which is > always a good thing in m... > I agree > >>>2. The java agent I used to enable connecting remotely is from sun, which > I believe has license i... > What sort of issues? > >>>It also works over HTTP which is probably not the protocol we want. I > usually use RMI, but the HT... > HTTP is probably better in the Stax environment, because I don't know > if Stax allows direct RMI access. Is there some sort of authorization > necessary to access the data? Once it is up and running, we could > publish the URL and let people take a look at it. However, I think you > are right about using other protocols. I don't know whether existing > JMX tools can also use HTTP. > > You may want to look at your patch to see if it is still valid. David > did a major commit last night (dealing with Lift actors) and you > might have to change things a bit on your side. > > > D. > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Andy the destroyer > > <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay.. I have a version with stats and > jmx code you can deploy... >
