Please note that the vote officially lasts 72 hours. We can't close the vote until then.
D. On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to sum up the vote so far. > > ESME PPMC +1: 6 > IMPC +1: 3 > IMPC -1: 1 > > We would need one more IMPC +1 vote to ratify the ESME team vote right? > > /Anne > > > > On 13. jan. 2010, at 09.07, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Gianugo Rabellino >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> ... In the future should this issue ever present itself to you, >>>> I hope you will do the proper thing and point the errant person >>>> at the relevant ASF policy >>> >>> That would be the same policy that says we _must_ remove copyright >>> notices from source files, right? The same policy that is now being >>> discarded in light of a compromise that makes very little sense and >>> sets a dangerous precedent?... >> >> I don't think we're discarding the policy. >> >> David is prevented from making any more commits that contradict this >> policy (as he left, but otherwise I would have asked for a vote to >> revoke his commit rights as suggested on the legal-disccus list), and >> we are treating the remaining copyright notices in the same way as >> we'd do for a committer that is no longer available (for any reason) >> to fix them themselves. >> >> Clarifying that we'd revoke people's commit rights if they refuse to >> abide by the policy that we're talking about >> (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html) has been a positive >> outcome of this saga, IMHO. >> >> -Bertrand > >
