That was the first one. I'd be curious to see if other compile errors were hidden or other errors would pop up during the tests.
D. On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good to me, unless some other reason to go to 2.0 comes up, in > which case we'll just have to discuss more! > > Very cool that there is really only one syntax error. > > Ethan > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> I agree. >> >> I just wanted to get a feeling for how many changes would be necessary. >> >> Let's agree to this, stay with the 1.1 snapshot until lift 2.0 >> supports Scala 2.8 with the 1.5 support. >> >> D. >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I agree with you Ethan and don't think we should push a move to Lift 2.0 >>> now. I was still surprised to see that only one error was found! The day >>> Lift supports Scala 2.8 I think we should move asap though to get the Java >>> 1.5 support which is important for us. (currently Lift 2.0 is on Scala >>> 2.7.7) >>> >>> /Anne >>> >>> >>> On 20 Jan, 2010, at 13:06 , Ethan Jewett wrote: >>> >>>> That's exactly what it is :-) Are we planning to move to Lift 2.0 >>>> right now? I suggest getting the 1.0 release out the door (even if >>>> that takes a couple more months) and then moving to Lift 2.0 for a 1.1 >>>> release. >>>> >>>> Ethan >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Just tried to use the latest Lift snapshot and got this error..... >>>>> >>>>> [WARNING] >>>>> D:\apache\esme\trunk\server_2.0\src\main\scala\bootstrap\liftweb\Boot. >>>>> scala:155: error: constructor cannot be instantiated to expected type; >>>>> [WARNING] found : net.liftweb.http.ParsePath >>>>> [WARNING] required: net.liftweb.http.Req >>>>> [WARNING] case ParsePath(l, _, _, _) if l startsWith >>>>> TwitterAPI.ApiPath => >>>>> Full(AuthRole("user")) >>>>> [WARNING] ^ >>>>> [WARNING] one error found >>>>> >>>>> Actually, think this change was based on Ethan's request: >>>>> http://old.nabble.com/Lift-AuthRoles,-httpAuthProtectedResource-td27080038.html >>>>> >>> >>> >> >
