But we really don't know what changes happened between Jan 5 and Jan 26 in the packages pulled by maven. ESME might not have changed (much) but the packages that it uses may have changed. Of interest would be to move the original files from Server A to Server B to see if they build correctly.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Sig Rinde <[email protected]> wrote: > No differences as far as I can see. The two: > > Server A: Esme built w/o problems Jan 5 > Server B: Esme build error Jan 26 > > Ubuntu 9.04 - both updated before installing ESME. > > JDK same. > > Basically same-same :) > > > 2010/1/26 Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]>: > > What are the other differences on the two servers Sig? > > > > /Anne Kathrine > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 26. jan. 2010, at 16.09, Sig Rinde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I have, on the other server that runs ok (except that original > >> api_test login issue) it's same OpenJDK, basically everything is > >> same... (I'm sure that did not help much LOL) > >> > >> > >> 2010/1/26 Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> I don't think anything has changed. Just that no one has used openJDK > >>> since > >>> then. > >>> > >>> /Anne Kathrine > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On 26. jan. 2010, at 16.01, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> But what has changed so that the problem now occurs? > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Yay! :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> On 26. jan. 2010, at 15.50, Sig Rinde wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Aha :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> java version "1.6.0_0" > >>>>>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.4.1) (6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu12) > >>>>>> OpenJDK Client VM (build 14.0-b08, mixed mode, sharing) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sig > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2010/1/26 Vassil Dichev <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We've had this before: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-esme-dev/200910.mbox/%[email protected]%3e > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The interesting part is that noone has implemented David's > suggestion > >>>>>>> to date, and still the problem seems to have been resolved (or was > >>>>>>> it?) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> BTW what JDK are you using? I've had my share of problems on > >>>>>>> Debian/Ubuntu because package management decided to pull openjdk-6, > >>>>>>> which was not mature enough to run bug-free. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Vassil > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Richard Hirsch > >>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm going to try it locally to see if it works on my laptop > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Sig Rinde <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Nothing I can see has changed, this one is absolutely up-to-date > >>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 9.04 following apt-get update and upgrade after starting > up > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>> fresh image. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Then: > >>>>>>>>> apt-get install subversion > >>>>>>>>> apt-get install maven2 > >>>>>>>>> apt-get install jetty > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Then: > >>>>>>>>> svn checkout > >>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/trunkesme > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Then fixing the two files. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Then problem :) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Now: rm -rf esme and started over > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> One never knows where I could have messed up, only mishap was > that > >>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>> lost contact with the server at some point during first mvn... so > >>>>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>>> I did & and logged out leaving it alone... lets see now: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Nope, exact same error. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Noticed that it starts saying compiling 49 packages, then dies > >>>>>>>>> after > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>> bit, and when trying again it says compiling 8 packages. No other > >>>>>>>>> clues. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 2010/1/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> RE plug-in: I remember. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think something else (Scala, lift, etc.) might have changed. > >>>>>>>>>> Has > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> anything > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> else changed in the environment? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It is all very strange. It is obviously a maven-related problem, > >>>>> > >>>>> because > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> ESME's code hasn't really changed at all in the last few weeks. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Sig Rinde <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Then I get this: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] FATAL ERROR > >>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] null > >>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] Trace > >>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.RuntimeException > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > com.yahoo.platform.yui.compressor.JavaScriptCompressor.printSourceNumber(JavaScriptCompressor.java:299) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > com.yahoo.platform.yui.compressor.JavaScriptCompressor.parse(JavaScriptCompressor.java:335) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > com.yahoo.platform.yui.compressor.JavaScriptCompressor.<init>(JavaScriptCompressor.java:532) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > net.sf.alchim.mojo.yuicompressor.YuiCompressorMojo.processFile(YuiCompressorMojo.java:178) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > net.sf.alchim.mojo.yuicompressor.MojoSupport.processDir(MojoSupport.java:151) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> BTW, it was you who suggested doing this last time, and then > all > >>>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>> ok for basically same setup (that was Jan 5th) :) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2010/1/26 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> what happens if you don't comment out the plug-in > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Sig Rinde <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this is a completely new install so I'm using "mvn jetty:run" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Prior to that: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. svn the full esme > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. add line to default.props > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. comment out plugin in pom.xml > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> using -e gave this at the end: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] Trace > >>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: command line returned > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> non-zero > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> value:1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:579) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:499) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.forkProjectLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:924) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.forkLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:767) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:529) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeStandaloneGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:512) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:482) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:330) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:291) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:142) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:336) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native > >>>>> > >>>>> Method) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>> > >>>>> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> command > >>>>> > >>>>> line > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> returned non-zero value:1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>> > >>>>> org.scala_tools.maven.JavaCommand.run(JavaCommand.java:196) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.scala_tools.maven.ScalaCompilerSupport.compile(ScalaCompilerSupport.java:124) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.scala_tools.maven.ScalaCompilerSupport.doExecute(ScalaCompilerSupport.java:54) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.scala_tools.maven.ScalaMojoSupport.execute(ScalaMojoSupport.java:208) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.scala_tools.maven.ScalaCompilerSupport.execute(ScalaCompilerSupport.java:29) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.scala_tools.maven.ScalaTestCompileMojo.execute(ScalaTestCompileMojo.java:58) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.java:451) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:558) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 20 more > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/1/26 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sig, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you give the full stack trace - I don't think this once > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> deep > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough for us to see if the error is in ESME or somewhere > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> else? > >>>>> > >>>>> And > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what command are you running that results in this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> error? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> mvn > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean install? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Sig Rinde <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Ethan, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planned to start over to test all fresh, so I created a new > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> fresh > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazon instance (same base image as the other live one), > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apt-get > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrade etc, now running 9.04 all latest. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New svn from esme. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Added new api_test user in default.props and commented out > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compression plug-in in pom.xml. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then fired it up and got this error: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] suggestion: remove the scalaVersion from pom.xml > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] /home/files/esme/server/src/test/scala > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] /home/files/esme/server/src/test/scala/../scala > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] Compiling 8 source files to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> /home/files/esme/server/target/test-classes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] Exception in thread "main" > >>>>> > >>>>> java.lang.StackOverflowError > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> scala.tools.nsc.symtab.Symbols$ClassSymbol.owner(Symbols.scala:1563) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > scala.tools.nsc.symtab.Symbols$Symbol.toplevelClass(Symbols.scala:940) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > scala.tools.nsc.symtab.Symbols$Symbol.toplevelClass(Symbols.scala:942) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > scala.tools.nsc.symtab.Symbols$Symbol.toplevelClass(Symbols.scala:942) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > scala.tools.nsc.symtab.Symbols$Symbol.toplevelClass(Symbols.scala:942) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] at > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > scala.tools.nsc.symtab.Symbols$Symbol.toplevelClass(Symbols.scala:942) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what did I forget this time :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/1/25 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sig, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for doing all that detective work. Unfortunately I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an Ubuntu box to test on. :-( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if there is some place that I pull in the setting > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration test user other than in the API2 code. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible. I will try to look in to it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question if you have the time: If you add another line in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> property > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file and assign a second user as integration admin, does > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> user > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop working in the web interface as well? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ethan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Sig Rinde <[email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Morning creative sleuth work: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Sorry, no difference between browsers: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. If I log on as another user, then log out in anything > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> root, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> say > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hosturl:8080/auth_view/" then no problem. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. If I log out and log on as api_test in root same > problem > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> all > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> browsers. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. This only for the aws instance, not for my local > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> (aws > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ubuntu, local is OS X) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Did a diff between the two (local and aws) webapp > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folders > >>>>> > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> found > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing different (except the .svn stuff which I removed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> first > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6. Did a diff between full esme directories and found no > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> except > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .svn folders and that esme on aws held a file named > >>>>> > >>>>> .gitignore. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The server works though, and now I know how to get in > there > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so > >>>>> > >>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> live with problem and assume it'll go away with a later > new > >>>>> > >>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> fresh > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install... :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/1/25 Richard Hirsch <[email protected]>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> might be a lift-specific problem with those browsers. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > >
