On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Uday Subbarayan <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Richard. This helps. What is the time-frame for code clean up and the > clean release?
ASAP. Weeks not months.... After our presentation this evening, we'll all return to cleaning up the code and preparing for the release. D. > > Thanks, > Uday. > > ------------------------- > > I do not blog but e-write: > > http://uds-web.blogspot.com > > --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: ESME in Commercial Products > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, February 1, 2010, 9:32 AM > > Hi, > > When ESME is released (which is our main priority right now), this > will happen based on the Apache License, which allows it to be used in > commercial products - see http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0. > > At the moment, there are a few files in the ESME source code that have > more restrictive licenses that do not allow them to be redistributed > in an Apache release. We are currently in the process of fixing this > issue. > > If you want, you can use ESME code right now for testing or any other > purposes, but our SVN might occasionally contain code with more > restrictive licenses than the Apache License, which will be cleaned up > before the release. > > D. > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Uday Subbarayan > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> Is there any issues in using ESME in a commercial product? >> >> *I am not able to follow all the legal issues going on in the list including >> LGPL, etc. >> >> Thanks, >> Uday. >> >> ------------------------- >> >> I do not blog but e-write: >> >> http://uds-web.blogspot.com >> >> >> > > > >
