On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have posted our candidate for the first Apache release developed > within the ESME podling. > > The candidate can be found at > > http://people.apache.org/~rhirsch/esme/ > > See the CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents. The release > candidate is a tar archive of the sources in > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/
The URL behind this element is incorrect if displayed in rich formatting: it should be https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1-0-0-incubating/ . Another reason to use text-only when writing emails. > > The MD5 checksum of the apache-esme-incubating-1.0- > src.tar.gz release package is > > 8E 43 0D DF F8 FE 15 9B 22 47 C2 C0 CC 30 21 2C > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if > a majority of at least three +1 ESME PPMC votes is reached. Assuming > the vote passes, I will ask the Incubator PMC to approve the release. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache ESME 1.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > Here's my +1. > > Since the last release attempt, the following changes have been made > * Updated README to indicate that ESME currently just supports JDK 1.6 > * Removed license reference from the README > * Removed GPL-licensed and other unused dependencies from pom.xml. (Thanks > Ethan) > Perform "mvn site" to see the current dependencies. The only dependencies > only license information are the com.twitter.* jars and I was unabled to > find > licensing info. Although newer versions in github are licensed with Apache > License > * Pom.xml no longer refers to lift snapshot but to the "1.1-M8" version > * Changed version in pom.xml to <version>apache-esme-1.0-incubating</version> > * removed svn files from release > * directory created by release is no longer called "trunk" > * Checked SHA signature on signed release but this should be a diff between > SHA1 > and SHA512 > > > Dick Hirsch
