On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Gianugo Rabellino <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK. >> >> I've tagged a new Release Candidate: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/esme/tags/apache-esme-1.0-incubating/ >> >> This means that we have to vote again (sigh!) -. >> >> This time I suggest we test the tagged RC before we do a vote. > > While at it, may I suggest the release to be explicitly labeled > 1.0RC1? There seem to be some rough edges in the process at least and > possibly somewhere in the code - maybe it would be best to seed a > release candidate or two in short cycles and gather additional peer > review rather than slapping an overpromising 1.0 on the release name?
Excellent idea. Will do. Can I use the same tag or should I create a new SVN tag as well. Ideally, I could use the existing tag and just rename the tar file for the release. > Plain 1.0 might generate expectations, whilst RCs are generally > believed to be workable enough, yet still have some i's to dot. > > For one, I'd be more comfortable in +1'ing releases - I held back mine > as I wanted to so some tests when this bug report came in. > > -- > Gianugo Rabellino > M: +44 779 5364 932 / +39 389 44 26 846 > Sourcesense - making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com >
